Liking Is for Cowards. Go for What Hurt, Like Love
This is not to say that love is only about fighting. Love is about bottomless empathy, born out of the heart’s revelation that another person is every bit as real as you are. And this is why love, as I understand it, is always specific. Trying to love all of humanity may be a worthy endeavor, but, in a funny way, it keeps the focus on the self, on the self’s own moral or spiritual well-being. Whereas, to love a specific person, and to identify with his or her struggles and joys as if they were your own, you have to surrender some of your self.
The
big risk here, of course, is rejection. We can all handle being
disliked now and then, because there’s such an infinitely big pool of
potential likers. But to expose your whole self, not just the likable
surface, and to have it rejected, can be catastrophically painful. The
prospect of pain generally, the pain of loss, of breakup, of death, is
what makes it so tempting to avoid love and stay safely in the world of
liking.
And
yet pain hurts but it doesn’t kill. When you consider the alternative —
an anesthetized dream of self-sufficiency, abetted by technology — pain
emerges as the natural product and natural indicator of being alive in a
resistant world. To go through a life painlessly is to have not lived.
Even just to say to yourself, “Oh, I’ll get to that love and pain stuff
later, maybe in my 30s” is to consign yourself to 10 years of merely
taking up space on the planet and burning up its resources. Of being
(and I mean this in the most damning sense of the word) a consumer.
When
I was in college, and for many years after, I liked the natural world.
Didn’t love it, but definitely liked it. It can be very pretty, nature.
And since I was looking for things to find wrong with the world, I
naturally gravitated to environmentalism, because there were certainly
plenty of things wrong with the environment. And the more I looked at
what was wrong — an exploding world population, exploding levels of
resource consumption, rising global temperatures, the trashing of the
oceans, the logging of our last old-growth forests — the angrier I
became.
Finally,
in the mid-1990s, I made a conscious decision to stop worrying about
the environment. There was nothing meaningful that I personally could do
to save the planet, and I wanted to get on with devoting myself to the
things I loved. I still tried to keep my carbon footprint small, but
that was as far as I could go without falling back into rage and
despair.
BUT
then a funny thing happened to me. It’s a long story, but basically I
fell in love with birds. I did this not without significant resistance,
because it’s very uncool to be a birdwatcher, because anything that
betrays real passion is by definition uncool. But little by little, in
spite of myself, I developed this passion, and although one-half of a
passion is obsession, the other half is love.
And
so, yes, I kept a meticulous list of the birds I’d seen, and, yes, I
went to inordinate lengths to see new species. But, no less important,
whenever I looked at a bird, any bird, even a pigeon or a robin, I could
feel my heart overflow with love. And love, as I’ve been trying to say
today, is where our troubles begin.
Because
now, not merely liking nature but loving a specific and vital part of
it, I had no choice but to start worrying about the environment again.
The news on that front was no better than when I’d decided to quit
worrying about it — was considerably worse, in fact — but now those
threatened forests and wetlands and oceans weren’t just pretty scenes
for me to enjoy. They were the home of animals I loved.
And
here’s where a curious paradox emerged. My anger and pain and despair
about the planet were only increased by my concern for wild birds, and
yet, as I began to get involved in bird conservation and learned more
about the many threats that birds face, it became easier, not harder, to
live with my anger and despair and pain.
How
does this happen? I think, for one thing, that my love of birds became a
portal to an important, less self-centered part of myself that I’d
never even known existed. Instead of continuing to drift forward through
my life as a global citizen, liking and disliking and withholding my
commitment for some later date, I was forced to confront a self that I
had to either straight-up accept or flat-out reject.
Which
is what love will do to a person. Because the fundamental fact about
all of us is that we’re alive for a while but will die before long. This
fact is the real root cause of all our anger and pain and despair. And
you can either run from this fact or, by way of love, you can embrace
it.
When
you stay in your room and rage or sneer or shrug your shoulders, as I
did for many years, the world and its problems are impossibly daunting.
But when you go out and put yourself in real relation to real people, or
even just real animals, there’s a very real danger that you might love
some of them.
Post a Comment